The aged care Star Ratings are changing — here’s why
Key points:
- Star ratings for residential aged care homes are changing to a redesigned Compliance rating and incorporating care minute targets for Staffing ratings from 1 October 2025
- 271 stakeholders informed the design changes for the aged care Star Ratings system
- Use the Find a Provider tool on the government website to gauge a provider’s quality of care.
The Star Ratings system debuted in December 2022 and it was designed to help families find high-quality aged care providers.
The five-star scale was introduced in response to the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety. It was meant to distil complex care metrics — Resident Experience (33 percent), Compliance (30 percent), Staffing (22 percent) and Quality Measures (15 percent) — into a digestible score.
The Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care unveiled the Design Changes for Star Ratings for Residential Aged Care – Consultation Findings Summary Report.
The new report, informed by 271 stakeholders, such as older people, families, providers and advocates, confronts the widely reported issues with the Star Rating system.
A striking revelation to emerge from the report was the push for providers to be held accountable throughout the system.
Over three-quarters of the cohort demanded a provider’s Compliance rating drop across all its homes if it was issued a formal regulatory notice for significant or systemic non-compliance.
Although 64 percent of providers were supportive of the measure, they cautioned that home-specific factors — like a good manager or unique challenges — often outweigh corporate oversight.
They wanted to draw a line in the sand between small mistakes and major breaches, like neglecting resident safety, to avoid unjust punishment. The report acknowledges this but leaves the concern unaddressed.
Staffing, the lifeblood of aged care, emerges as another flashpoint. The consultation found 75 percent of stakeholders supported a cap of two stars on the Staffing rating for homes failing to meet both care minute targets — hours of direct care mandated per resident.
Among stakeholders, 87 percent expressed support for incorporating the 24/7 registered nursing requirement into the Staffing rating, with many advocating a two-star cap for non-compliance.
Yet, rural providers cried foul: workforce shortages, not negligence, often thwart them. They begged for exemptions, transparently flagged, lest they’re crushed by urban-centric rules.
Beneath these reforms lies a quieter, yet electrifying, thread: data integrity.
Stakeholders didn’t just want new rules — they demanded the numbers be trustworthy.
The Staffing rating’s potency, they argued, hinges on accurate, reliable care minute data, especially when self-reported by providers.
Two-thirds insisted Compliance ratings rebound instantly once non-compliance is fixed, not linger in purgatory for 1 – 3 years.
The report’s call for transparent regulatory notices — 75 percent want System Governor notices published, 85 percent demand financial non-compliance hit ratings — doubles down, promising a window into a home’s soul.
The consultation leaves that gauntlet on the table, a test of whether the system can finally earn trust.
Finally, the report hints at a design revolution: half-star ratings and richer data. A narrow 51 percent endorsed half-stars for the Overall Star Rating, envisioning a ladder of incremental progress — 3.5 stars as a reachable rung, not a distant five.
The push for systemic accountability could unmask corporate culprits, staffing reforms might anchor care in reality and data integrity could rebuild faith among stakeholders. However, the report isn’t a one-size-fits-all solution for the sector.
The consultation’s 271 voices have spoken and their hopes and fears are now in the government’s hands. This year has set the stage for mass reforms, intended to make the landscape easier to navigate and safer for those seeking quality care.
Greg Burton is an accredited FPA Aged Care Specialist.
Contact Carrick Aland’s Wealth Planning team on 1300 466 998 or visit carrickaland.com.au/wealth-planning/.
WEBSITE DISCLAIMER
This website is published by Carrick Aland Wealth Planning Pty Ltd. Carrick Aland Wealth Planning Pty Ltd (CARN 263248) are authorised representatives of Millennium3 Financial Services Pty Ltd (ABN 61 094 529 987, AFSL 244252). The information contained in this website and any of the resources available through it including eBooks, fact sheets, and seminars (‘Content’) has been prepared for general information purposes only and is not (and cannot be construed or relied upon as) personal advice. No investment objectives, financial circumstances, or needs of any individual have been taken into consideration in the preparation of the Content. Financial products entail risk of loss, may rise and fall, and are impacted by a range of market and economic factors, and you should always obtain professional advice to ensure trading or investing in such products is suitable for your circumstances.
Under no circumstances will any of Carrick Aland Wealth Planning Pty Ltd, Millennium3 Financial Services Pty Ltd, its officers, representatives, associates, or agents be liable for any loss or damage, whether direct, incidental, or consequential, caused by reliance on or use of the Content. This Content is restricted to Australian residents and is for the intended recipient only. From time to time, Carrick Aland Wealth Planning Pty Ltd representatives or associates may hold interests in or transact in companies or products mentioned herein and may receive fees or other benefits, in connection with the making of any recommendation or facilitating a transaction in such companies or products.
Source:
Article originally published on https://www.agedcareguide.com.au/talking-aged-care/the-aged-care-star-ratings-are-changing-heres-why. Reproduced with permission of DPS Publishing.
Important: This provides general information and hasn’t taken your circumstances into account. It’s important to consider your particular circumstances before deciding what’s right for you. Although the information is from sources considered reliable, we do not guarantee that it is accurate or complete. You should not rely upon it and should seek qualified advice before making any investment decision. Except where liability under any statute cannot be excluded, we do not accept any liability (whether under contract, tort or otherwise) for any resulting loss or damage of the reader or any other person.
Any information provided by the author detailed above is separate and external to our business. Our business does not take any responsibility for any action or any service provided by the author. Any links have been provided with permission for information purposes only and will take you to external websites, which are not connected to our company in any way. Note: Our company does not endorse and is not responsible for the accuracy of the contents/information contained within the linked site(s) accessible from this page.
